From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Emergency Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Amiodarone Improves Survival after Cardiac Arrest

Although antiarrhythmic drugs are the standard of care in cardiac arrest, there is little scientific evidence demonstrating their benefit. This placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study evaluated amiodarone as the initial antiarrhythmic agent for patients in ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia. This study was supported by the drug manufacturer.

Over a 25-month period, 3,954 patients were treated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Seattle and King County; 667 met the study criteria of ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia after three defibrillation attempts. Enrolled patients received 1 mg of epinephrine intravenously followed by either 300 mg of amiodarone or placebo, plus additional antiarrhythmic drugs as indicated. Patients who received amiodarone were more likely to survive to hospital admission (108 of 246 [44%] vs. 89 of 258 [34%], p=0.03), but they were also more likely to have hypotension (59% vs. 48%, p=0.04) and bradycardia (41% vs. 25%, p=0.004). The trial did not have sufficient power to detect differences in survival to hospital discharge.

Comment: Seattle and King County are known to have a high survival rate for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Overall survival to hospital admission in this analysis was a remarkable 39%, a rate unlikely to be reproduced in other locations. The benefit of amiodarone as the initial antiarrhythmic agent may make sense, but further study is needed. Future studies should include systems with more typical survival rates and should determine survival to hospital discharge.

— JG Adams

Published in Journal Watch Emergency Medicine November 1, 1999

Citation(s):

Kudenchuk PJ. Amiodarone for resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1999 Sep 16 341 871-878.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1999. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.