From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Emergency Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Does Early Angiography Improve Outcomes in Non-ST Elevation AMI?

Early intervention to open infarct-related arteries in patients with acute MI with ST-segment elevation clearly reduces mortality. Rapid angiography and intervention to stabilize presumed culprit lesions in patients with acute MI without ST elevation seems rational, but the benefit of this approach has not been documented. These investigators retrospectively analyzed a subset of patients from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention (MITI) registry that comprised 12,331 consecutive patients with acute MI.

The cohort included patients who exhibited elevated CK-MB levels but no ST elevation on the initial ECG; patients with cardiogenic shock were excluded. Of the 1635 patients in the cohort, 308 were admitted to 2 hospitals that preferred an invasive approach (defined as performance of cardiac catheterization within 6 hours of admission on at least 25% of patients with chest pain and nondiagnostic ECGs), and 1327 were admitted to 17 hospitals that followed a more conservative strategy. Patients admitted to the hospitals with invasive strategies were significantly more likely to undergo early coronary angiography (59% vs. 8%; P<0.001) and angioplasty (45% vs. 6%; P<0.001). After adjustment for predictors of mortality, there was a nonsignificantly lower 30-day mortality in the invasive group (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.25-1.21). Long-term (mean, 3.2 years) adjusted mortality was significantly lower in the invasive group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.83).

Comment: The findings from this provocative study suggest that early aggressive intervention can reduce mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. Selection bias could have influenced outcome in this retrospective analysis, but these findings argue strongly for a prospective, randomized study.

— JM Christenson

Published in Journal Watch Emergency Medicine May 1, 2000

Citation(s):

Scull GS et al. Early angiography versus conservative treatment in patents with non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000 Mar 15 35 895-902.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2000. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.