From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Emergency Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

HIV Seroconversion Resulting from Insensitive Blood Screening Measures

It is estimated that 1 in 450,000 to 1 in 660,000 blood donations in the U.S. are made by donors who are infected with HIV but have not yet seroconverted to HIV-positive status as measured by current viral screening techniques. Currently used techniques include HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibody enzyme immunoassays (EIA), p24 antigen EIA, and nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT); these become positive at approximately 25 days, 14 to 21 days, and 4 to 16 days after infection, respectively. For logistic reasons and cost conservation, NAT is performed on mini-pools of 16 to 24 whole blood donations.

This case study demonstrated direct and unequivocal linkage between the donor's platelets and the recipient's seroconversion. Using stored samples, researchers retrospectively analyzed blood and platelets from a screened donor whose blood products had been linked to recipients' seroconversions to HIV positivity; by single-donor NAT screening, they found that the donor's plasma contained HIV DNA at 5 to 39 copies/mL at the time of donation. This low viral level was not detected by NAT mini-pool testing.

Comment: Existing safeguards are inadequate to detect very low levels of HIV in donor blood. Implementation of single-donation NAT testing would narrow, but not close, the window of transfusion infection potential. Emergency physicians should continue to administer blood products appropriately but with wariness of this remote, although catastrophic, potential problem.

— JA Marx

Published in Journal Watch Emergency Medicine September 8, 2000

Citation(s):

Ling AE et al. Failure of routine HIV-1 tests in a case involving transmission with preseroconversion blood components during the infectious window period. JAMA 2000 Jul 12 284 210 -214.

Klein HG. Will blood transfusion ever be safe enough? JAMA 2000 Jul 12 284 238 -240.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2000. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.