From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Emergency Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Still Substantial Risk for MI Patients with Normal Initial ECG

The prognostic value of a normal initial ECG in patients with acute MI has not been appropriately examined. The authors of this observational study analyzed data on 391,208 patients enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction who were diagnosed with acute MI by standard criteria between June 1994 and June 2000.

The initial ECG was normal in 30,759 patients (7.9 percent), nonspecific in 137,574 (35.2 percent), and diagnostic (ST-segment elevation or depression or left bundle-branch block) in 222,875 (57.0 percent). In-hospital mortality rates were 5.7 percent, 8.7 percent, and 11.5 percent, respectively. Within the normal ECG cohort, men younger than 65 had a mortality rate of only 1.5 percent. The combined rates of in-hospital mortality and life-threatening adverse events (ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, development of pulmonary edema or cardiogenic shock, and/or hypotension requiring intervention) were 19.2 percent, 27.5 percent, and 34.9 percent, respectively.

Comment: These data indicate that among patients with acute MI, those with normal or nonspecific initial ECGs have a lower but still clinically significant chance of serious morbidity or death compared with those with diagnostic ECGs. The high rate of death and adverse events may be because patients with normal ECGs presented later after symptom onset and were less likely to present with chest pain than those with diagnostic ECGs.

— John A. Marx, MD, FACEP

Published in Journal Watch Emergency Medicine December 19, 2001

Citation(s):

Welch RD et al. Prognostic value of a normal or nonspecific initial electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 2001 Oct 24 286 1977-1984.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2001. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.