From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Emergency Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Pair of Bedside Tests Excludes Pulmonary Embolism

Authors of a 1997 study suggested that the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism could be excluded by a combination of 2 tests: D-dimer assay and alveolar dead-space fraction (ADSF). The rationale was that an abnormal D-dimer assay suggests the presence of intravascular thrombus and an elevated ADSF indicates the presence of pulmonary vascular obstruction. In a multicenter, prospective, noninterventional trial led by the same principal investigator, a convenience cohort of 380 hemodynamically stable, adult ED patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) underwent these 2 tests before ventilation-perfusion scanning or helical chest computed tomography. The trial was supported in part by the manufacturers of the devices and assays investigated.

Both volumetric capnography to calculate ADSF and D-dimer testing using a heparinized arterial whole blood agglutination assay were performed at bedside. PE was diagnosed based on standard radiologic criteria in 64 patients (16.8 percent); of these, 20 had an abnormal D-dimer assay only, 3 had an abnormal ADSF only, 40 had abnormal results on both, and 1 (the sole false-negative) had normal results on both. An abnormal result on either or both tests had a sensitivity for PE of 98.4 percent and a specificity of 51.6 percent.

Comment: Current methods of diagnosing PE are invasive, cumbersome, prolonged, and extraordinarily resource-consumptive. A simple screening tool has been high on the wish list of EPs, given the myriad clinical presentations of this life-threatening diagnosis. These findings suggest that a negative whole blood agglutination D-dimer assay coupled with a normal alveolar dead-space fraction is associated with a probability of PE of less than 1 percent in stable patients deemed at risk for the condition.

— JA Marx

Published in Journal Watch Emergency Medicine May 2, 2001

Citation(s):

Kline JA et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a bedside D-dimer assay and alveolar dead-space measurement for rapid exclusion of pulmonary embolism: A multicenter study. JAMA 2001 Feb 14 285 761-768.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2001. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.