From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Emergency Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Airway Assessment Using "LEMON" Score Predicts Difficult ED Intubation

Use of this tool can reduce the chance of unexpectedly encountering a difficult airway.

As many as 1% of emergency department intubations end up as a "failed airway" (unable to intubate the patient). One tool developed to determine which patients might pose airway management difficulties is the LEMON method. The authors of this study from Scotland developed an airway assessment score based on this method and determined the score's utility in predicting difficult airways in the ED. They studied 156 patients who were intubated successfully in a single ED between June 2002 and September 2003.

The score, with a maximum of 10 points, was calculated by assigning 1 point for each of the following LEMON criteria:

  • L=Look externally (facial trauma, large incisors, beard or moustache, and large tongue)
  • E=Evaluate the 3-3-2 rule (incisor distance <3 fingerbreadths, hyoid/mental distance <3 fingerbreadths, thyroid-to-mouth distance <2 fingerbreadths)
  • M=Mallampati (Mallampati score ≥3)
  • O=Obstruction (presence of any condition that could cause an obstructed airway)
  • N=Neck mobility (limited neck mobility).

For each patient, the airway assessment score was compared with the Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic view seen during intubation (1=full view, 4=glottis not visualized). At intubation, 114 patients were classified as Cormack-Lehane grade 1 (defined by the authors as easy intubation), and 42 were classified as grade 2 or higher (defined by the authors as difficult intubation). Patients in the difficult-intubation group had significantly higher LEMON scores than did those in the easy-intubation group. Of the criteria used to calculate the score, only large incisors, inter-incisor distance <3 fingerbreadths, and thyroid-to-floor-of-mouth distance <2 fingerbreadths were associated significantly with difficult intubation.

Comment: Emergency physicians can significantly reduce their likelihood of inadvertently encountering difficult intubations by assessing airways before intubation. This study validates that the LEMON method predicts which patients have difficult-to-manage airways.

— Diane M. Birnbaumer, MD, FACEP

Published in Journal Watch Emergency Medicine February 16, 2005

Citation(s):

Reed MJ et al. Can an airway assessment score predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency department? Emerg Med J 2005 Feb; 22:99-102.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2005. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.