From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Emergency Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Ultrasound for Peripheral Intravenous Access

As it does for central lines, ultrasound increases success in difficult peripheral intravenous cannulation.

Use of emergency ultrasound to guide procedures, including central venous access, is rapidly becoming standard in emergency medicine. Yet, little is known about the utility of ultrasound for guiding peripheral intravenous (IV) access. In a prospective, randomized, controlled study, researchers assessed this technique in patients presenting with predictors of difficult IV access.

Patients were eligible for the study if they had a history of difficult peripheral IV access due to obesity, IV drug use, or chronic medical problems and if nurses could not establish peripheral IV access after three attempts. Of the 60 enrolled patients, 21 were randomized to standard therapy, in which physicians or nurses attempted IV access using landmark and palpation approaches, and 39 were randomized to ultrasound-guided IV access.

The ultrasound group had a higher success rate than the control group (97% vs. 33%), shorter time to successful cannulation (13 vs. 30 minutes), and fewer percutaneous punctures (1.7 vs. 3.7).

Comment: Here is another potentially valuable use of ultrasound in the ED. Its proven benefits for central venous access seem to extend to difficult peripheral-vein cannulation, too. Perhaps we should consider going straight to ultrasound guidance for all patients with difficult access, thereby sparing patients undue pain. Combining ultrasound guidance with local anesthesia might even make IV insertion relatively painless.

— Richard D. Zane, MD, FAAEM

Published in Journal Watch Emergency Medicine January 4, 2006

Citation(s):

Costantino TG et al. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 2005 Nov; 46:456-61.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2006. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.