From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Emergency Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

SYNERGY Trial Outcomes at 6 and 12 Months

Patients with non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndromes remain at high risk for adverse events at 1 year, despite aggressive treatment.

In the SYNERGY trial, 9978 patients with non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndromes were randomized to receive low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) or unfractionated heparin until cardiac procedures were performed or antithrombin therapy was no longer needed. Patients were also treated with evidence-based strategies. In an earlier report of findings at 30 days, enoxaparin was found to be at least as effective as heparin. The researchers now report findings at 6 and 12 months.

At 6 months, the enoxaparin and heparin groups had similar rates of death and nonfatal MI (17.6% and 17.8%) and rehospitalization (17.9% and 19.9%). Rates of all-cause mortality at 1 year also were similar in the two groups (7.6% and 7.3%).

Comment: Two conclusions can be drawn from this study. First, the main outcome measures were similar in enoxaparin patients and heparin patients at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year. Second, and more important, patients with non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndromes remain at high risk for recurrent cardiovascular events, revascularization procedures, and death despite use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, enoxaparin or heparin, and aggressive revascularization strategies.

— John A. Marx, MD, FAAEM, FACEP

Published in Journal Watch Emergency Medicine February 28, 2006

Citation(s):

Mahaffey KW et al. High-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with low-molecular-weight or unfractionated heparin: Outcomes at 6 months and 1 year in the SYNERGY trial. JAMA 2005 Nov 23/30; 294:2594-600.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2006. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.