From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Emergency Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Occult Bacteremia in the Postpneumococcal Vaccine Era: No More Blood Cultures

In a study of some 8000 previously healthy, young febrile children with no apparent source of infection, the rate of true-positive blood cultures was only 0.25%.

For decades, the work-up of febrile young children included blood cultures to rule out occult bacteremia. This study assessed the usefulness of this practice in the era of routine childhood immunization with pneumococcal vaccine. Researchers retrospectively reviewed the charts of 8408 previously healthy children (age range, 3–36 months) who presented to a pediatric emergency department in Phoenix between 2004 and 2007 with fever ≥39°C, had no apparent source of infection, had blood cultures drawn, and were discharged from the ED.

A pediatric infectious diseases specialist determined that 21 blood cultures were true positives (0.25%); of these, 14 grew Streptococcus pneumoniae. Another 159 positive cultures (1.89%) were determined to be contaminants, yielding a ratio of 7.6 contaminants for every 1 true positive culture.

Comment: Routine vaccination for Haemophilus influenzae and pneumococcus has virtually eradicated occult bacteremia in well-appearing febrile children, and the results of this study suggest that blood cultures should no longer be performed in such patients. The complete blood count also is of questionable usefulness in this patient cohort and should not be ordered. Ill-appearing children, whether febrile or not, still warrant an appropriately directed work-up, which might include blood cultures.

Diane M. Birnbaumer, MD, FACEP

Published in Journal Watch Emergency Medicine April 17, 2009

Citation(s):

Wilkinson M et al. Prevalence of occult bacteremia in children aged 3 to 36 months presenting to the emergency department with fever in the postpneumococcal conjugate vaccine era. Acad Emerg Med 2009 Mar; 16:220.

Reader Remarks:

Read all Reader Remarks on this article

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

(more...)

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.