From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Emergency Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

More Disturbing News About Prehospital Trauma Intubation

Prehospital intubation failed in 31% of trauma patients in a large urban trauma system.

Prehospital intubation (PHI) has come under fire as studies have reported high rates of failure and complications (JW Emerg Med Mar 30 2007 and Apr 1 2000). To determine the effectiveness of PHI in a single urban trauma system, researchers in Miami reviewed the records of all 203 patients who received PHI during a 34-month period.

PHI, defined as endotracheal intubation, use of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or Combitube, or cricothyrotomy before ED arrival, was successful in 69% of patients. Intubation failure, defined as improper location of the endotracheal tube or the need for a rescue device after failed intubation attempts, occurred in 31% of all patients and included unrecognized esophageal intubation (12%), Combitube use (14%), LMA use (3%), and cricothyrotomy (2%). Overall, 64% of patients who received PHI died. In-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between patients with failed and successful PHI (71% and 60%), but the percentage of patients who were dead on arrival was significantly higher in the failed-intubation group (48% vs. 26%). Significantly more patients transported by air than by ground were successfully intubated (82% vs. 52%).

Comment: In this trauma system, air paramedics received more training and performed more intubations than their ground counterparts, and only air crews were permitted to use succinylcholine. These factors likely account for the superior performance of air crews in this study. The 12% incidence of esophageal intubation is unacceptably high, consistent with prior study findings, and, therefore, profoundly disturbing. As editorialists remind us, this study, despite its flaws, provides further impetus to reexamine how we manage airways for trauma patients in the prehospital setting.

Ron M. Walls, MD, FRCPC, FAAEM

Published in Journal Watch Emergency Medicine September 18, 2009

Citation(s):

Cobas MA et al. Prehospital intubations and mortality: A level 1 trauma center perspective. Anesth Analg 2009 Aug; 109:489.

Herff H et al. Prehospital intubation: The right tools in the right hands at the right time. Anesth Analg 2009 Aug; 109:303.

Reader Remarks:

Review and add to remarks on this article

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.