From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Emergency Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Chest Compression Fraction and Survival from Cardiac Arrest

Minimizing interruption of chest compressions is associated with improved survival.

Previous studies have shown that chest compression is performed only about 50% of the applicable time during prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts. In this multicenter, observational cohort study, researchers assessed the fraction of CPR time spent on chest compressions and its effect on survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who had an initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia and who had received CPR for at least 1 minute prior to shock. The authors analyzed records for 506 patients who were treated by 78 emergency medical services systems in Canada and the U.S. from 2005 to 2007. The proportion of time dedicated to chest compressions during 1-minute intervals was measured by changes in thoracic impedance recorded from the defibrillator electrodes.

Overall, 23% of patients survived to hospital discharge. Patients were categorized into five groups according to the average proportion of time spent on chest compressions: 0%–20% (100 patients), 21%–40% (74), 41%–60% (117), 61%–80% (143), and 81%–100% (72). After adjustment for potentially confounding variables, the odds ratio for survival to discharge was 3.01 in the group with an average chest compression fraction of 61%–80% compared with the group with the lowest fraction. The authors estimate that a 10% increase in chest compression fraction would result in an OR for survival of 1.11.

Comment: The group with a chest compression fraction of 81%–100% in this study was small, and the associated OR for survival was not statistically significant; however, the finding of improved survival in the group with an average fraction of 61%–80% is compelling. Increasing the proportion of CPR time dedicated to chest compression is associated with a modest improvement in survival. Although this type of study cannot prove causation, a causal relation is plausible and makes biological sense.

Aaron E. Bair, MD, MSc, FAAEM, FACEP

Published in Journal Watch Emergency Medicine October 30, 2009

Citation(s):

Christenson J et al. Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 2009 Sep 29; 120:1241.

Reader Remarks:

Read all Reader Remarks on this article

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

(more...)

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.